Timed practice

Full practice exams

Pick an exam. Each one shows its format first, then runs one section at a time on its own clock.

Practice Exam 1

55 multiple-choice and 4 free-response questions, in the format of the AP U.S. Government and Politics Exam.

Choose a mode

Exam conditions Timed like the real exam. Nothing is checked until a section ends.Study mode Untimed. Each answer is checked as you give it, with its explanation.

Testing accommodations

Time and a half Each section gets 1.5 times the time.Double time Each section gets twice the time.Untimed The clock shows time used and never ends a section.

You can switch to study mode or start over at any point during the exam.

Section	Questions	Time
Section I: Multiple Choice	55	80 minutes
Section II: Free Response	4	100 minutes

How the exam works

One section at a time. When a section's clock reaches zero, the section ends and is scored.
Multiple choice is scored when its section ends, with an explanation for every choice.
Free response is never scored by the page. When the section ends, you see the scoring guide and a model response for each part and tick the points your answer earns.
At the end you get your score and the time you used for each section.
In study mode each multiple-choice answer is checked as soon as you give it, with its explanation, and each free-response question has a button that opens its scoring guide.
Switching to study mode partway keeps your answers and checks the ones you have given. Start over clears everything and lets you choose a mode again.
Your answers are kept in this browser tab if the page reloads, and nowhere else.

Section I: Multiple Choice

55 questions · 80 minutes

A town charter requires regular elections and limits public offices. A delegate claims electoral popularity lets officials ignore the charter. Which principle most directly challenges the claim?
Answer: B.
1. A
  The scenario concerns limited authority rather than state representation.
2. B
  Electoral support does not erase legal boundaries on officeholders.
3. C
  Judicial selection is not the source of the stated restriction.
4. D
  Unrestricted authority is the claim being challenged.
Competing trade associations and neighborhood organizations bargain over a city zoning bill. Which democratic model does their activity most directly illustrate?
Answer: D.
1. A
  The scenario features competing organizations rather than a single narrow leadership.
2. B
  The groups are influencing lawmakers, not directly enacting a ballot proposition.
3. C
  The stated activity is specifically organized group competition.
4. D
  Competition among organized interests is central to the pluralist model.
A reform group argues that more residents should attend public meetings, deliberate, and join civic activities. Which model most closely matches that emphasis?
Answer: A.
1. A
  The emphasis is broad civic involvement by citizens.
2. B
  The proposal seeks broader rather than more restricted participation.
3. C
  Trustee judgment concerns representatives deciding by their own knowledge.
4. D
  Competition among established associations is different from the stated broad-participation emphasis.
How does Madison’s argument in Federalist No. 10 defend a large republic?
Answer: C.
1. A
  Madison accepts diversity of interests rather than assuming uniformity.
2. B
  Removing liberty would be an unacceptable remedy for faction.
3. C
  An extended republic multiplies interests and makes a majority faction harder to coordinate.
4. D
  The argument seeks to check faction, not guarantee its command of representatives.
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress depended on state legislatures to raise money for common expenses. How did this arrangement affect national governing capacity?
Answer: B.
1. A
  The Articles did not establish the described presidency.
2. B
  Reliance on state contributions limited dependable centralized revenue.
3. C
  The Articles did not create that national judicial system.
4. D
  Congress lacked that direct exclusive revenue authority.
At a new constitutional convention, small states demand equal representation while large states demand population-based representation. Which arrangement most closely parallels the Great Compromise?
Answer: A.
1. A
  The compromise combined population-based House representation with equal-state Senate representation.
2. B
  Population alone would omit the small states’ equal-state chamber.
3. C
  Equal states alone would omit the large states’ population-based chamber.
4. D
  County equality does not supply the population-based component.
Questions 7 to 10 refer to the following.
Primary-source paraphrase of Federalist No. 51 (1788): Public officials should possess institutional means and motives to resist encroachment by other departments. Dependence on the people is the primary control, yet structural precautions are also needed. In the American compound republic, authority is divided between distinct governments and then among departments within each, creating an additional security for rights. The essay is a defense of a constitutional design, not a measurement of whether every check succeeds. Federalist No. 51, institutional checks and compound-republic passages

What reasoning does the source offer for institutional checks?
Answer: D.
1. A
  Its argument calls for precautions beyond good intentions.
2. B
  The source explicitly treats popular dependence as primary but insufficient alone.
3. C
  Concentration conflicts with the divided structure being defended.
4. D
  The source links structural safeguards to officeholders’ interests in resisting encroachment.
Uses the material above question 7.

How does the compound-republic passage relate to federalism?
Answer: C.
1. A
  The source retains distinct governments rather than assigning all authority nationally.
2. B
  States are governing institutions, not merely private associations.
3. C
  The passage describes two divisions: between governments and among departments.
4. D
  The passage does not establish a unanimity requirement for each administrative act.
Uses the material above question 7.

Which implication for civic advocates follows from the divided structure described?
Answer: B.
1. A
  Multiple venues can remain even when one official opposes a request.
2. B
  Different levels and departments provide distinct routes, although none guarantees success.
3. C
  Political access does not authorize ignoring law.
4. D
  A state-level action does not automatically decide a national vote.
Uses the material above question 7.

How does Senate review of a presidential judicial nominee fit the source’s reasoning?
Answer: A.
1. A
  Shared appointment authority supplies a structural check on unilateral executive action.
2. B
  A check constrains power rather than eliminating accountability.
3. C
  The nominee cannot compel the Senate’s approval.
4. D
  The check involves the national Senate, not a governor.
Which pairing accurately describes the constitutional dispute in McCulloch v. Maryland?
Answer: A.
1. A
  The case upheld the bank as an appropriate means and rejected Maryland’s interfering tax.
2. B
  The case did not concern abolition of courts.
3. C
  McCulloch was about the bank, implied powers, and national supremacy.
4. D
  The school-zone gun dispute belongs to United States v. Lopez.
How do the regular election cycles of the House and Senate differ?
Answer: D.
1. A
  The House renews every two years and the Senate only a portion at a time.
2. B
  The term lengths are reversed.
3. C
  Both chambers have scheduled elections.
4. D
  Two-year House terms and staggered six-year Senate terms create different electoral exposure.
Questions 13 to 14 refer to the following.
Original fictional House committee record. The table follows the same forty proposals through successive stages.
Original fictional teaching data
Stage Bills

Referred 40
Reported to floor 12
Passed House 9

Which statement accurately describes the committee record?
Answer: A.
1. A
  The reported-to-floor row lists 12 bills.
2. B
  Twenty-eight is 40 minus 12: the bills not reported.
3. C
  Thirty-one is 40 minus 9: bills not shown as passing.
4. D
  The final row lists nine passed bills.
Uses the material above question 13.

How many of the referred bills were not reported to the floor?
Answer: C.
1. A
  Thirty-one subtracts passed bills, measuring a different stage.
2. B
  Three is the difference between 12 reported and nine passed.
3. C
  Forty referred minus 12 reported equals 28 not reported.
4. D
  Reported bills are the group that did advance to the floor.
What did Baker v. Carr establish about an equal-protection challenge to legislative apportionment?
Answer: D.
1. A
  The decision did not create presidential preapproval of maps.
2. B
  The holding opened a route to federal judicial review.
3. C
  The holding concerned judicial review, not automatic criminal penalties.
4. D
  Baker recognized justiciability of the equal-protection apportionment claim.
Questions 16 to 17 refer to the following.
Original fictional presidential record of regular vetoes, not pocket vetoes. Hint: the override share is overrides divided by regular vetoes in the same year.
Original fictional teaching data
Year Regular vetoes Overrides

1 3 0
2 5 1
3 8 2

Which pattern appears in this record?
Answer: B.
1. A
  Both series rise rather than decrease or stay unchanged.
2. B
  Vetoes rise from 3 to 5 to 8, and overrides from 0 to 1 to 2.
3. C
  Overrides are below vetoes in each row.
4. D
  The veto counts are different in every row.
Uses the material above question 16.

Which comparison accurately describes the share of regular vetoes overridden?
Answer: C.
1. A
  The record moves in the opposite direction.
2. B
  The listed shares differ and none is one-third.
3. C
  The shares are 0/3, 1/5, and 2/8: 0%, 20%, and 25%.
4. D
  Two of eight is one-quarter, not one-half.
Hamilton defended a single executive as promoting energy and identifiable responsibility. Which explanation describes that rationale?
Answer: D.
1. A
  Energy is not a claim that the executive has no constitutional limits.
2. B
  The argument does not eliminate the legislature’s constitutional checks.
3. C
  Hamilton criticizes the divided responsibility of a plural executive.
4. D
  Hamilton connects unity with energy and identifiable accountability.
A president broadcasts a short message asking residents to urge Congress to prioritize port repairs. How does the communication tool affect the policy process?
Answer: B.
1. A
  Communication does not itself appropriate funds.
2. B
  The bully pulpit and rapid communication can mobilize public pressure and set priorities.
3. C
  A presidential message is not a judicial ruling.
4. D
  Viewers do not become members of the committee.
How does Marbury v. Madison’s judicial-review reasoning relate to Federalist No. 78 and constitutional judicial independence?
Answer: A.
1. A
  Marbury treats the Constitution as controlling over an incompatible statute; Federalist No. 78 defends independent constitutional judgment.
2. B
  Both accounts support independent constitutional judgment rather than obligatory deference to conflicting legislation.
3. C
  Hamilton distinguishes judicial judgment from executive force; Marbury does not give courts independent enforcement forces.
4. D
  Judicial review applies constitutional limits; it does not replace Article V amendment procedures.
A lower court applies a controlling precedent to a new case with materially similar facts. Which judicial principle is illustrated?
Answer: C.
1. A
  The facts describe adherence to controlling precedent, not a willingness to depart from restraint to address policy questions.
2. B
  Judicial review concerns judging governmental action against the Constitution; the distinguishing fact here is following precedent.
3. C
  Stare decisis describes reliance on precedent in materially similar cases.
4. D
  Independence concerns insulation from improper outside influence; no such pressure or safeguard is described.
Questions 22 to 23 refer to the following.
Original institutional infographic. Arrows show claimed constitutional routes and limits, not an actual case outcome.
Tap to open the picture full size

How does the tenure shield contribute to the infographic’s judicial-independence argument?
Answer: B.
1. A
  Independence remains tied to applying law and the Constitution.
2. B
  The shield connects tenure to independence from an immediate reelection threat.
3. C
  The symbol does not assign legislative appointment power to judges.
4. D
  The separate revision arrow shows a possible legislative response within legal limits.
Uses the material above question 22.

What does the Congress-to-revised-statute arrow illustrate?
Answer: D.
1. A
  The arrow’s limitation distinguishes statutory revision from constitutional amendment.
2. B
  A statute’s revision is not the removal of judges.
3. C
  A congressional response does not supply unlimited executive power to ignore orders.
4. D
  The labeled route represents legislative revision while preserving constitutional constraints.
An agency selects technical inspectors through examinations and relevant experience rather than campaign loyalty. How does this differ from patronage?
Answer: C.
1. A
  Rewarding political service is the patronage contrast.
2. B
  Career inspection roles are not made elected offices by merit selection.
3. C
  Merit selection rests on qualifications rather than political support.
4. D
  Party membership is not the described merit criterion.
A statute directs an agency to set specific equipment-safety thresholds within a stated range. The agency chooses a threshold through rulemaking. What power is it using?
Answer: B.
1. A
  An agency rule is not an Article V amendment.
2. B
  Congress delegates implementation choices within a statutory framework.
3. C
  Congress appropriates funds; threshold setting is implementation.
4. D
  Rulemaking is not a presidential response to a bill.

Original fictional teaching data
Stage	Bills
Referred	40
Reported to floor	12
Passed House	9

Original fictional teaching data
Year	Regular vetoes	Overrides
1	3	0
2	5	1
3	8	2

Questions 26 to 27 refer to the following.

Original fictional oversight record. Staffing also increased during these reporting periods; the observations do not isolate any one cause of changes in compliance.

Original fictional teaching data
Period	Overdue inspections	Accountability action
1	30%	Congressional committee hearing
2	18%	Presidential directive to improve scheduling
3	10%	Court order enforcing a statutory deadline

Which conclusion appropriately connects the numerical pattern to accountability?

Uses the material above question 26.

What do the recorded actions illustrate about the agency’s political environment?
Answer: C.
1. A
  A compliance trend does not establish exclusive congressional control.
2. B
  Implementation data do not transfer judicial authority to the agency.
3. C
  The record identifies legislative oversight, executive direction, and a judicial enforcement order.
4. D
  A court order does not erase other branches’ lawful tools.
Questions 28 to 29 refer to the following.
Original press cartoon. Interpret Panel B; the image communicates an argument rather than documenting a specific lawsuit.
Tap to open the picture full size

How does the government gate illustrate a civil-liberties concern?
Answer: D.
1. A
  The barrier is labeled as government action, not a private buying choice.
2. B
  The paper is seeking a remedy, not appointing an official.
3. C
  A challenge arrow does not establish the outcome of judicial review.
4. D
  The gate represents government interference with the communication of ideas.
Uses the material above question 28.

How do the gate and its label communicate the cartoon’s constitutional concern?
Answer: B.
1. A
  The timing is before publication, not later liability for defamation.
2. B
  A government barrier before publication represents prior restraint.
3. C
  The gate is government action rather than a private purchasing decision.
4. D
  The gate is explicitly before publication; a condition imposed only after distribution does not match its timing.
Which feature was central to the Establishment Clause issue in Engel v. Vitale?
Answer: A.
1. A
  State sponsorship of the school prayer created the Establishment Clause issue in Engel.
2. B
  A student’s private voluntary religious expression differs from the state’s arranging a prayer.
3. C
  The relevant issue is the state-sponsored exercise, not merely whether an individual may decline participation.
4. D
  Neutral access for private student groups differs from official sponsorship of a school prayer.
How does McDonald v. Chicago illustrate selective incorporation?
Answer: C.
1. A
  The decision imposes a constitutional limit rather than immunity.
2. B
  A city ordinance cannot repeal a constitutional amendment.
3. C
  McDonald applied the individual arms right to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
4. D
  Incorporation limits state action rather than making rights solely a state choice.
Which reasoning supports providing counsel to an indigent defendant in a state felony prosecution?
Answer: A.
1. A
  The right to counsel supports fair procedures for an accused person.
2. B
  Counsel and jury protections serve different functions.
3. C
  Representation does not guarantee a particular verdict.
4. D
  State criminal proceedings remain subject to applicable constitutional protections.
Which statement accurately describes the relationship among Roe v. Wade and Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization?
Answer: D.
1. A
  Dobbs rejected rather than reaffirmed Roe’s constitutional abortion holding.
2. B
  Both are judicial decisions, not an amendment and a statute.
3. C
  Dobbs returned abortion regulation decisions to legislatures subject to the legal framework.
4. D
  Dobbs held that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion and overturned Roe.
How does Brown v. Board of Education connect a constitutional provision to a governmental response to discrimination?
Answer: B.
1. A
  Brown’s holding concerns state-imposed segregation and equal protection, not an identical state-federal funding formula.
2. B
  Brown held state-mandated racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.
3. C
  Brown addressed segregated public education under equal protection; it did not forbid every distinction among districts.
4. D
  The Fifteenth Amendment concerns racially discriminatory voting restrictions; Brown did not require direct election of school officials.
In Shaw v. Reno, the Court allowed a Fourteenth Amendment challenge to a district alleged to separate voters by race. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot, plaintiffs alleged a city-boundary change excluded nearly all Black voters while excluding no white voters; the Court held that these allegations stated a Fifteenth Amendment claim and reversed dismissal. Which comparison accurately connects the constitutional issues? Gomillion, 364 U.S. 339, majority opinion
Answer: C.
1. A
  Neither summary creates a rule against every boundary change.
2. B
  Those subjects do not describe the supplied racial districting disputes.
3. C
  Shaw involves equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment; Gomillion involves race-based voting exclusion under the Fifteenth.
4. D
  Gomillion reversed dismissal of a federal constitutional claim, and Shaw did not create presidential map approval.
Questions 36 to 39 refer to the following.
Primary-source paraphrase: In his January 11, 1944 State of the Union message, Franklin Roosevelt argued that economic insecurity undermines individual freedom. He proposed protections concerning employment, medical care, education, and fair business competition without monopoly domination, and asked Congress to explore implementation. These were proposed economic rights in a presidential message, not a newly ratified constitutional amendment. Roosevelt, January 11, 1944 message, economic-rights section

How does the source connect its economic proposals to an American core value?
Answer: D.
1. A
  The paraphrase proposes protections, not identical earnings.
2. B
  It does not argue for official immunity.
3. C
  The source criticizes monopoly domination rather than treating it as necessary competition.
4. D
  Roosevelt’s argument links material security to the ability to exercise freedom.
Uses the material above question 36.

How does the proposed public role relate to the major parties’ general ideological alignments?
Answer: D.
1. A
  The proposed program goes beyond protecting property alone.
2. B
  A presidential proposal does not establish universal contemporary agreement.
3. C
  The source cannot reverse the general alignment of conservative positions with a more limited national role.
4. D
  A larger public role addressing insecurity aligns with the general liberal tendency; this does not predict every member’s vote.
Uses the material above question 36.

If Congress funds a national medical-care program in response to the message, how would that tool differ from a Fed rate decision?
Answer: A.
1. A
  Congressional spending is a fiscal tool, distinct from the Fed’s monetary tools.
2. B
  Enacting program funds does not itself transfer the Fed’s rate decision to Congress.
3. C
  Funding a program does not redefine the Fed as a state agency.
4. D
  The use of money alone does not identify monetary policy; the tool and institution matter.
Uses the material above question 36.

Which policy implication is most consistent with the message’s proposed education and medical-care protections?
Answer: B.
1. A
  The source proposes protections rather than abolishing every program.
2. B
  The proposals call for a public response rather than leaving all insecurity to private action.
3. C
  The message advocates public engagement on these issues.
4. D
  A proposed program in a message is different from ratified constitutional text.
Questions 40 to 41 refer to the following.
Original fictional one-time survey. Each age group contains 100 respondents. Each selected one strongest reported influence; family counts are a subset of each group. The support column concerns the same proposed national service program in each group.
Original fictional teaching data
Age group Family named strongest Support for program

18-29 35 44%
30-49 40 49%
50 and older 30 53%

Which description accurately reports the family responses?
Answer: A.
1. A
  The family counts sum to 35 plus 40 plus 30, or 105 among 300 people.
2. B
  The total is 105 across groups, not within every group.
3. C
  The table does not cross-tabulate each person’s influence choice and policy support.
4. D
  The middle group has the highest family count, at 40.
Uses the material above question 40.

Which description of policy support stays within the data?
Answer: C.
1. A
  A one-time survey compares different people, not individual changes.
2. B
  The gap is nine percentage points, not a ninefold ratio.
3. C
  The percentages rise from 44 to 49 to 53 across the ordered groups.
4. D
  The middle group names family most often, while the oldest group has the highest program support.
A campaign compares repeated candidate polls but changes the last wave from neutral wording to praise for its candidate. Why does the change weaken its claim that support grew?
Answer: B.
1. A
  Sampling and wording address different sources of error.
2. B
  Leading framing changes the measurement and can create apparent movement.
3. C
  Exit polls are defined by voting respondents and timing, not favorable language.
4. D
  Repeated polls may sample different people.
Questions 43 to 45 refer to the following.
Original fictional county study. Eligible populations are equal. Party contact is a count of eligible residents reached, not a randomly assigned treatment. A separate exit survey asked 200 voters in each county for their main voting reason. Counties differ in age composition, early-voting access, and campaign activity. Hint: divide votes by eligible residents for turnout.
Original fictional teaching data
County Eligible residents Votes cast Residents contacted by parties

Pine 20,000 12,000 8,000
Mesa 20,000 8,000 3,000

Original fictional teaching data
Main voting reason in exit survey Pine voters Mesa voters

Incumbent’s past performance 90 70
Candidate’s future plans 60 80
Choosing one party across races 50 50

What does the largest voting-reason category in Pine illustrate?
Answer: C.
1. A
  Future plans account for 60 of 200 responses rather than all voters.
2. B
  Straight-ticket choice has 50 responses, below the 90 past-performance responses.
3. C
  Ninety Pine respondents selected past performance, more than 60 or 50; that is retrospective reasoning.
4. D
  Ninety of 200 is 45%, below a majority.
Uses the material above question 43.

Which turnout conclusion fits the observations?
Answer: A.
1. A
  Pine has 60% turnout and Mesa 40%; several other conditions differ.
2. B
  Contact was not randomly assigned, and access and demographics also differ.
3. C
  The eligible populations are identical, and Mesa cast fewer votes.
4. D
  Equal denominators do not require the same number to participate.
Uses the material above question 43.

How do the party-contact counts illustrate parties’ role as linkage institutions?
Answer: D.
1. A
  The contact totals are not linked to every person’s ballot choice.
2. B
  The study does not measure or exclude other communications.
3. C
  Outreach does not confer government election-administration authority.
4. D
  Reaching residents is a route for parties to communicate and mobilize, although the counts do not guarantee voting.
A party loses support among younger workers and responds with new portable-benefit proposals and mobile outreach. How does this illustrate party adaptation?
Answer: C.
1. A
  The scenario explicitly changes both proposals and communication methods, rather than preserving them.
2. B
  The response changes policy proposals and communication; it does not change the legal administration of elections.
3. C
  The strategy connects coalition weakness to revised policy appeals and communication methods.
4. D
  The scenario does not say candidate-specific messages disappear; organizational adaptation can coexist with candidate-centered campaigning.
In a single-seat plurality contest, a third-party candidate attracts supporters but finishes behind two major-party candidates. How does the voting rule affect representation?
Answer: B.
1. A
  That would be a proportional arrangement rather than the stated rule.
2. B
  One-seat winner-take-all rules award the seat to the plurality winner.
3. C
  A single seat cannot be awarded to every candidate.
4. D
  Support below the winning plurality does not confer the seat.
Questions 48 to 49 refer to the following.
Original cartoon about organized influence. It is a perspective on political access, not measured proof that any group wins a policy dispute.
Tap to open the picture full size

How do the unequal lanes express the cartoon’s perspective on interest groups?
Answer: A.
1. A
  The fast and waiting lanes visualize unequal ease of reaching the hearing.
2. B
  The cartoon supplies no membership counts or proportional scale.
3. C
  Unequal routes emphasize differences rather than identical resources.
4. D
  Access can facilitate influence without guaranteeing outcomes.
Uses the material above question 48.

How does the common hearing-door endpoint relate to policymaking?
Answer: D.
1. A
  Providing input differs from formal enactment.
2. B
  Waiting for legislative access does not confer judicial office.
3. C
  A hearing receives input without guaranteeing agreement.
4. D
  The hearing is an institutional stage at which organized actors can provide views and evidence.
Which claim about the Electoral College is defensible?
Answer: B.
1. A
  National popular-vote rank does not automatically award all state electors.
2. B
  State-based elector allocation can yield different electoral and nationwide popular outcomes.
3. C
  Most states use winner-take-all allocation rather than mandatory proportional allocation.
4. D
  The ordinary process uses electoral votes, with a contingent House role only under specified conditions.
Which evidence best supports the claim that incumbency can help a congressional candidate?
Answer: C.
1. A
  Challengers do not automatically inherit the incumbent’s office resources.
2. B
  Incumbents must still win election.
3. C
  Constituent relationships and recognition can provide electoral advantages.
4. D
  Congressional seats are not awarded by residence seniority.
Which reasoning best explains why reliance on professional campaign consultants can have both benefits and costs?
Answer: D.
1. A
  Consultants neither eliminate costs nor guarantee results.
2. B
  Campaign law still applies to professionally managed campaigns.
3. C
  Hiring expertise does not transfer ownership or control of media.
4. D
  The reasoning identifies a strategic benefit and a financial or organizational tradeoff.
Which statement accurately connects Citizens United v. FEC to the First Amendment?
Answer: A.
1. A
  The decision invalidated restrictions on independent corporate expenditures and upheld challenged disclosure and disclaimer provisions.
2. B
  Independent expenditures are different from direct candidate contributions.
3. C
  The Court upheld the disclosure and disclaimer provisions at issue.
4. D
  Independence from a campaign is a relevant distinction.
How does horse-race election reporting differ from reporting that compares candidates’ policy proposals?
Answer: C.
1. A
  That reverses the distinction between standings and substantive policy detail.
2. B
  Polling shifts do not enact policy.
3. C
  Horse-race framing centers on standings and competition.
4. D
  A reporting frame does not compel uniform preferences.
How does Citizens United relate to debates about changing media and political communication?
Answer: B.
1. A
  Private corporate speech is not automatically government speech.
2. B
  The case concerns protected political expression and the identity of the speaker, relevant to media channels.
3. C
  Protection of expression does not compel agreement.
4. D
  Protected speech does not confer exclusive control over debate.

Original fictional teaching data
Age group	Family named strongest	Support for program
18-29	35	44%
30-49	40	49%
50 and older	30	53%

Original fictional teaching data
County	Eligible residents	Votes cast	Residents contacted by parties
Pine	20,000	12,000	8,000
Mesa	20,000	8,000	3,000

Original fictional teaching data
Main voting reason in exit survey	Pine voters	Mesa voters
Incumbent’s past performance	90	70
Candidate’s future plans	60	80
Choosing one party across races	50	50

Section II: Free Response

4 questions · 100 minutes

Question 1: Concept Application 3 points

Original fictional scenario: Congress authorizes a transportation agency to establish passenger-disclosure standards within broad statutory limits. The agency adopts a detailed rule. A House committee says the agency’s interpretation exceeds the program’s intended scope and schedules a hearing. The president supports the rule.
1. A.
  
  Describe the authority the agency uses to adopt the rule.
  Question 1, part A: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part A
  - 1 point Describe delegated discretionary or rulemaking authority in implementing the statute.
  Model response
  The agency uses rulemaking discretion delegated by Congress to implement the statutory program.
2. B.
  
  Explain how the scheduled hearing can check the agency.
  Question 1, part B: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part B
  - 1 point Explain how investigation, testimony, or monitoring can assess implementation and constrain agency action.
  Model response
  The committee can question officials and examine whether implementation follows statutory intent, exposing departures and creating pressure to revise the rule.
3. C.
  
  Explain one additional formal congressional action that could affect implementation despite presidential support.
  Question 1, part C: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part C
  - 1 point Explain a valid formal congressional tool, such as appropriations or statutory revision, and how it constrains implementation without claiming unilateral House enactment.
  Model response
  Congress could restrict funding for the disputed implementation through appropriations, using its power of the purse to constrain the agency. A law must still satisfy the constitutional lawmaking process.
Your score: 0 of 3, from the boxes you ticked.

Question 2: Quantitative Analysis 4 points

Original fictional county study. Counties also differ in age composition, campaign mobilization, and polling-place access. There is no random assignment. Hint: turnout rate is ballots cast divided by voting-eligible adults; compare rates in percentage points.

Original fictional registration and turnout data
County	Voting-eligible adults	Ballots cast	Registration procedure
Cedar	10000	6200	Automatic registration option
Flint	10000	4700	Individual registration application

A.

Identify the county with the higher turnout rate.
Question 2, part A: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
Score part A
- 1 point Identify Cedar.
Model response
Cedar has the higher rate.
B.

Describe the difference in turnout rates using the data.
Question 2, part B: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
Score part B
- 1 point Describe the higher rate with the correct rates or 15-percentage-point gap.
Model response
Cedar’s rate is 62% and Flint’s is 47%, a gap of 15 percentage points.
C.

Explain how a registration rule could influence participation.
Question 2, part C: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
Score part C
- 1 point Explain a mechanism linking registration procedures to the costs or ease of voting.
Model response
An automatic registration option can reduce the procedural steps eligible residents face, lowering a structural barrier to participation.
D.

Explain why these data cannot establish that the registration difference caused the entire turnout gap.
Question 2, part D: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
Score part D
- 1 point Explain a specific uncontrolled difference and why it prevents isolating the registration effect.
Model response
Age composition, mobilization, and access differ too, so the comparison does not isolate registration from other turnout influences.

Question 3: SCOTUS Comparison 4 points

Required case: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969).

Non-required case summary: In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988), a principal removed pages from a school-sponsored newspaper produced as part of a journalism course that had not been opened as a public forum. The Court distinguished personal student expression from school-sponsored curricular expression. It held that educators could exercise editorial control over the latter when their actions were reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns. This summary concerns school-sponsored curricular speech, not every form of student expression. Hazelwood, 484 U.S. 260, majority opinion
1. A.
  
  Identify the constitutional protection at issue in both cases.
  Question 3, part A: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part A
  - 1 point Identify First Amendment speech protection.
  Model response
  Both concern freedom of speech under the First Amendment.
2. B.
  
  Describe the relevant facts and outcome in Tinker.
  Question 3, part B: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part B
  - 1 point Describe the armband protest and the ruling protecting it in the absence of sufficient disruption or interference.
  Model response
  Public-school students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. The Court held that the school’s prohibition violated their speech rights when the record did not show the required substantial disruption or interference with others’ rights.
3. C.
  
  Explain why the different facts support different outcomes.
  Question 3, part C: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part C
  - 1 point Explain the personal-expression versus school-sponsored-curricular distinction and connect it to the different judicial standards or outcomes.
  Model response
  Tinker concerned personal symbolic expression, whereas Hazelwood involved a school-sponsored curricular newspaper. The latter setting supported editorial authority tied to legitimate pedagogical concerns rather than treating the publication as the students’ wholly independent expression.
4. D.
  
  Explain how the comparison illustrates balancing liberty and public institutional responsibilities.
  Question 3, part D: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part D
  - 1 point Explain a qualified balance between expression and the school’s curricular responsibilities without claiming unlimited censorship.
  Model response
  The cases protect student expression while recognizing that a school’s responsibility for curricular material can support a different kind of regulation. That responsibility is limited by the stated pedagogical connection rather than a blanket right to suppress every unpopular student opinion.
Your score: 0 of 4, from the boxes you ticked.
Question 4: Argument Essay 6 points

Develop an argument about whether dividing national government power among branches improves citizens’ opportunities to influence public policy. Use at least one of these foundational documents: the U.S. Constitution or Federalist No. 51. Support your argument with two relevant pieces of evidence, at least one from a listed document. Explain how each supports the argument. Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective through explicit rebuttal or refutation. This is original argument practice; use your own reasoning and compare with the rubric after writing.
1. A.
  
  State a defensible thesis that establishes a line of reasoning.
  Question 4, part A: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part A
  - 1 point State a defensible thesis that answers the prompt and establishes a reasoned relationship between divided powers and civic influence.
  Model response
  Dividing national power improves civic access because citizens can seek legislative changes, executive implementation choices, and judicial remedies through distinct institutions, even though the divisions can slow decisions.
2. B.
  
  Provide two specific pieces of relevant evidence, including evidence from a listed foundational document.
  Question 4, part B: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part B
  - 1 point Evidence level 1: identify at least one piece of evidence relevant to the topic; a general reference may earn this first evidence point.
  - 1 point Evidence level 2, one additional point: either use one piece of specific relevant evidence to support the argument, OR identify two pieces of evidence relevant to the topic. The two-piece route does not require a credited thesis.
  - 1 point Evidence level 3, one additional point: earn the thesis point and use two specific relevant pieces of evidence to support that thesis, with at least one from a foundational document listed in the prompt. Score these as cumulative evidence levels, for a maximum of three evidence points.
  Model response
  Article I gives Congress lawmaking and taxing authority, allowing citizens to seek statutory and funding changes. Article III establishes courts, and judicial review offers a route for constitutional challenges. Federalist No. 51 explains how institutional checks restrain concentrated power.
3. C.
  
  Explain how the evidence supports your thesis.
  Question 4, part C: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part C
  - 1 point Use reasoning to explain how or why at least one piece of specific relevant evidence supports an argument responding to the prompt. At least one specific relevant evidence piece is required; this reasoning point does not require the thesis point.
  Model response
  Because Congress controls legislation and appropriations, advocates can press committees even when an administration disagrees. Because courts apply constitutional limits, challengers can seek a legal remedy through a separate institution. These routes create alternative opportunities rather than requiring agreement from one dominant official.
4. D.
  
  Explicitly rebut or refute an opposing or alternate perspective.
  Question 4, part D: your response. It stays in this browser tab and is never sent anywhere.
  Score part D
  - 1 point Earn the thesis point and accurately describe an opposing or alternate perspective, then rebut or refute that perspective with reasoning. Merely acknowledging, dismissing, or restating it is insufficient.
  Model response
  An opposing view is that checks create gridlock and therefore reduce public influence. Delay is a real cost, but it does not eliminate access: an advocate blocked by executive opposition can still pursue legislation or a legal challenge where appropriate. Distinct routes can preserve opportunities even when immediate policy success is uncertain.
Your score: 0 of 6, from the boxes you ticked.

Your results

Section	Score	Time used
Section I
Section II

Free-response scores are the points you ticked against the scoring guide. The page never grades them.

Practice Exam 2