2021, Set 1, Question 1 · Content Application · 7 points

2021 AP Psychology FRQ 1 (Set 1) answers

Writing a research paper, and grading the stack

Show how five concepts, from self-efficacy to efferent neurons, could shape a student's work on a long paper, then how two more could affect her teacher's grading.

Skip to the worked answer and scoring (try the question first if you can)

This exam had two free-response questions to answer in 50 minutes, one applying psychology concepts to a scenario and one on research methodology, each scored out of 7 points. The current exam has 2 free-response questions in 70 minutes. The skills these questions practice still count.

1 Read the question

The question is College Board's, from the 2021, Set 1 exam. It starts on page 2 of the PDF. College Board no longer posts this exam, so it opens from the copy of College Board's PDF that the Internet Archive saved on December 12, 2025.

Open Question 1 (PDF, page 2)

2 Write your answer

Answer each part the way you would on the exam, in full sentences, with your work shown. Your writing saves as you type.

3 Score it

Score your answer against College Board's scoring guidelines, one point at a time. Give yourself a point only when your answer says what the guideline asks for.

Scoring guidelines (PDF, page 2) What the exam readers saw (Chief Reader report)

4 Worked answer and scoring

Here is how a response that earns full credit could read, part by part, and what College Board's scoring guidelines look for, put in our own words. Open a part once you have written your own answer to it. The scoring guidelines PDF above is the official word on every point.

Seven concepts, seven points, and each one is scored only when it is tied to Malia's paper or Mr. Barry's grading. Name the concept, say what it means in a few words, then show what it does to the work: whether she finishes, how she types, whether he gets through the stack. A definition with no link to the story earns nothing.

Part A 5 points

Model answer

Self-efficacy: Malia is sure she is capable of writing a strong research paper, so she starts early, keeps working through the weeks and finishes it. (If she doubted that she could do it, she might put it off and turn in weak work.)

Low neuroticism: Malia is emotionally stable and calm, so a long, open-ended assignment does not make her anxious, and she works steadily and gets it done on time.

External locus of control: Malia believes her grade depends on luck or on whether the teacher happens to like her, not on her effort, so she does little research and does not finish the paper.

Divergent thinking: Malia brainstorms many possible topics and several ways to organize her argument before choosing one, which gives her an original paper.

Efferent neurons: these motor neurons carry signals from her brain and spinal cord out to the muscles of her hands, so her fingers move to type the paper.

What earns each point

  1. Malia believes in her own ability to write the paper, and that belief helps her finish it (or doubting her ability makes her less likely to finish). Self-efficacy is a belief about one's capability at a specific task. General confidence or self-esteem is a different idea and does not score, so the answer names her belief that she can do this paper.
  2. A trait of the low end of neuroticism (calm, emotionally stable, not anxious) tied to how she completes the paper. Low neuroticism is emotional stability, which the current course names directly in the Big Five. Describing diligence would be conscientiousness, a different factor, so the answer stays with calm and low anxiety.
  3. Malia thinks outside forces such as luck, fate or a biased teacher decide her results, and that changes whether she completes the paper. An external locus is a belief that outcomes are out of one's own hands. The answer has to show that belief shaping her effort; simply worrying about bad luck, or noting that she cannot control the grading, describes no such belief.
  4. Malia generates many ideas or a creative, original approach for the paper, and this affects how she completes it. Divergent thinking produces many possible answers to an open problem. Searching for the single best way to write the paper would be convergent thinking.
  5. Efferent (motor) neurons produce a movement, such as her fingers typing, that lets her complete the paper. Efferent neurons carry commands outward to muscles. Feeling the paper or seeing the screen is sensory, which is afferent, so the movement has to be named.
Part B 2 points

Model answer

Incentive theory: Mr. Barry promises himself an evening out once the whole stack is graded, and that outside reward pulls him through the papers.

Crystallized intelligence: over many years Mr. Barry has built up a large store of facts about the subject and a wide vocabulary, so he recognizes errors in the papers at once and grades them accurately and quickly.

What earns each point

  1. An outside reward or a desired activity motivates Mr. Barry, and that helps him finish the grading. Incentive theory explains behavior by the pull of rewards outside the person. Wanting to help his students for its own sake is intrinsic motivation, so the answer gives him a reward to earn.
  2. His accumulated knowledge (facts, vocabulary, general information) helps him grade the papers well, or a lack of it slows him. Crystallized intelligence is stored knowledge built over a lifetime. Thinking fast on new problems is fluid intelligence, and simply being an experienced grader does not name the knowledge itself, so the answer points to what he knows about the subject.

Common mistakes

The Chief Reader report for 2021 lists no common mistakes for this question.

Question, scoring guidelines and Chief Reader report: College Board, from the Internet Archive. The title, summary and worked answer are ours.